A Seminar on “Gender in the Perception of Young Research Staff”

 


By Doan Thi Ngoc

In conjunction with the National Strategy for the Advancement of Women, the Institute for Developmental Studies invited Dr. Thai Thi Ngoc Du, Director of the Gender and Society Research Center, Hoa Sen University, to present a seminar on “Gender in the Perception of Young Research Staff” to raise awareness on gender equality for their employees.


Because she was one of the pioneers to study gender and women’s issues, Dr. Du said she felt honored today to be at the Institute for Developmental Studies to share and address a narrow perspective of gender equality with the audience.  She called for participants to discuss issues openly and to exchange ideas candidly and frankly regarding their interest and intentions in gender research.


The focus of Dr. Du’s presentation was on: gender equality, the evolution of feminism (three waves of feminism), and the discussion of practical gender issues in everyday life. The seminar attracted about 40 young research representatives from various units of the Institute for Developmental Studies, such as: Economic, Culture-Society, News Division, Science Management, and Urban Environment Planning; one representative from the Gender Equality office of the Department of Labor, Invalids, and Social Affairs also attended. All attendees participated excitedly and enthusiastically took part in analyzing and debating real life matters in combination with gender views.


An Overview of Gender Equality

 

The Vietnamese gender perspective


For a long time Vietnam has shown great interest in and concern about goals and activities of gender equality and the advancement of women. One of its significant achievements was that a Law on Gender Equality was passed on November 29, 2006. The new law defined key aspects of gender equality in all areas of social and family life, and provided measures to promote gender equality, responsibilities of all public and private agencies, and oversight of violations. In particular, the National Strategy for the Advancement of Women in Vietnam is one example of the institutionalization of gender equality targets to eliminate discrimination and ensure women’s equal rights in the fields of labor, employment, education and health care. The law was passed to improve the quality of women’s participation in economic, political and social fields and to enhance the capacity of the national machinery for the advancement of women.


Gender perspectives exist in all fields of endeavor at different levels; therefore, gender mainstreaming in inter-disciplinary research such as: economics, health, social science, etc, brings practical benefits to individuals, organizations, social programs, and public policies. Due to objective and subjective factors, few gender studies have been performed in Vietnam. Therefore, gender research is like a fertile and promising land for researchers to explore and generate knowledge.


Definition of the term Gender Equality


To understand what gender is, we should begin with the definition of "Gender Equality". Dr. Du employed simple questions to explicit respondents’ ideas and thoughts. She said, perhaps many of you are familiar with gender study.  However, are you familiar with the term "gender" or “gender equality” and do you think that people misapprehend or understand the term differently? Some participants said that the concept sounded strange, some said it is a little bit familiar, and others said they do not remember what they learned in the past. Generally, all participants wanted Dr. Du to analyze the term in depth.


During Dr Du’s presentation, one young participant remarked that the definition of gender equality is understandable; nonetheless, the law solely refers to the position and role of males and females, but why doesn’t the law make mention of the position and role of gay people? Dr Du responded by pointing out that when regarding demography, human beings are considered as being either male or female when being born, and societal relationships are based only on the two sexes. However, when regarding sexuality, our relationships are broken down not only as heterosexual but also as gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTs) relationships. Generally, women in a patriarchal society are often at a greater disadvantage than are men, and LGBTs are also discriminated against. In society, lesbians are doubly stigmatized - as women and as lesbians. Therefore, the gender equality set out here is not based on the sexes; it is rather centered on human beings because as human beings we are equal in all aspects. More importantly, human rights are thus conceived as universal and egalitarian.  Therefore, the law needs to be adapted and reformed to fit with the actual situations. Professor Le Thi Quy recently cited that: “the Constitution of Vietnam has, over many past decades, enshrined gender equality between men and women in all aspects. That is a large achievement; however, if the law only legislates or applies at this level, women are not really equal. Though men and women are human beings, there are natural differences between the sexes based on biological and anatomic factors, most notably differing reproductive roles, along with disparity between the two sexes due to gender, which is socially constructed. If we just apply the same treatment (based on what is common) without paying attention to the individuality or uniqueness, there will never be true equality” (Le Thi Quy, GAS Web site, 2012) [2].


According to the Law on Gender Equality in Vietnam, " Gender equality indicates that men and women have an equal position and role; are given equal conditions and opportunities to develop their capacities for the development of the community and family, and equally enjoy the achievement of that development” [1].


The Evolution of Feminism


Three waves of feminism


What is the difference between gender equality and the women’s rights’ movement? Some people think that gender equality is the struggle for women’s rights; is it true or not? Historically, there have been three waves of feminism. The first wave of feminism began in the late 19th century, the second wave was from 1960 to 1960, and the third wave of feminism was from the 1990s to present.


The first wave of feminism (1848 – 1920)

The first wave of feminism took place in the late 19th century in North America, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom when the revolution of industrialization and modernization arose. The industrial zones grew dramatically like mushrooms in the big cities, while the proportion of the agricultural sector steadily decreased. This occurrence of economic and social change created a phenomenon which drew a tremendous labor force from the countryside to the cities and towns to become factory workers. Both men and women workers in the factories were oppressed, exploited, and suffered under a terrible social welfare. Workers stood up fighting for higher wages. In addition to the male workers’ union movement, there was a gradual emergence of  women leaders who, struggling for higher wages, demanded the same wage, shorter working hours, and other social welfare benefits such as health insurance and maternal leave. Female workers compared with male workers were always more disadvantaged; for example, women were less likely to be paid the same amount for doing the same jobs. Because women were always considered at a disadvantage, International Women’s Day (originally International Working Women’s Day) was originated during the first wave of feminism and anniversary is observed on March 8 of every year to honor women and draw the attention of the public.


During the early 20th century the feminist movement in France, UK, and the USA emphasized the right to vote. The French Revolution occurred in 1789 by transferring and overthrowing the monarchy to establish democracy; through the right to vote, people were able to express their expectations and aspirations. However, in France men had suffrage (legal right to vote) while women did not until they obtained their right to vote in 1944. After many feminist movements, American women exercised their right to vote for the first time during elections in November of 1920. Another significant movement was to reform and expand career options for women while utilizing a famous slogan “career has no sex”. At that time women were not allowed to study law, though thanks to such movements for equal rights women's jobs increasingly expanded. Society was gradually becoming more democratic and several women's rights were recognized, nevertheless, there were many rights that were as yet not "accepted" such as abortion and reproductive rights or body ownership. For example, if a woman had an unwanted pregnancy and wanted to go to a clinic to abort, she could not because there were no legal abortion services. As a result, she had to choose an unsafe and secret clinical service for an abortion procedure which many times led to unpredictable and dangerous complications to the woman’s life.


The second wave of feminism (1960 -1990)


Simone de Beauvoir is a well-known modern French writer, existentialist philosopher, political activist, feminist theorist, and social theorist, who has a profound understanding of interdisciplinary knowledge: biology, history, philosophy, ethnology. Although she did not consider herself a philosopher, she had significant influence on feminist existentialism and feminist theory. In 1949, Simone de Beauvoir launched a book "The Second Sex" which is central to the precept and laying of the groundwork for radical feminism and for analyzing women’s oppression, and is a foundational tract of contemporary feminism. In 1999, many research centers, institutes, and universities around the world organized gender activities and conferences to commemorate the 50th anniversary of her book. This indicated Beauvoir’s huge impact on the school of thought on gender and women’s issues. Since Simone de Beauvoir first analyzed and made distinct clearly biological and social proposals, why has The Second Sex paved an avenue for gender studies? Biologically, sex refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that are universal, unchangeable over time as well as defining men and women, whereas, gender refers to the socially constructed roles and positions, behavior and personality traits that are developed through education, social environment, culture, politics, and economics considered appropriate for men and women [4].


In the chapter "Woman: Myth and Reality" in The Second Sex, Beauvoir argued that men had made women the "Other" in society by putting a false aura of "mystery" around them. Men employed the “Other” as an excuse to not understand women and women’s issues. This bias was carried out by groups with powerful positions and economic resources who maintained a patriarchal society. Beauvoir wrote that this also happened on the basis of other categories of identity, such as race, class, and religion. From this point of view, she stressed that many existing patriarchal societies have assigned and equated the roles and positions of male and female with biological properties. For example, in Vietnam society, traditional values ​​for women who are responsible for the caring of members of families, and doing housework with their natural roles as mothers (pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding) are combined. Beauvoir made a huge contribution toward separation of sex and gender features. She believed that women are as talented as men and if given the opportunity they can elevate themselves, move beyond their ability to reach transcendence into a position in which they can be free to advance themselves and society.


According to Simone de Beauvoir, in terms of personality traits, it is common to see women as being very meticulous yet having very short or no vision at all, because women for generations always did the housework and therefore became conditioned by the views of an old society. Given such positions and circumstances, they could do nothing else than become conditioned toward being careful and detailed. Beauvoir cited that: “when women were beginning to take part in the affairs of the world, it was still a world that belonged to men. Man-the-sovereign provided woman-the-liege with material protection and undertook the moral justification of her existence. Consequently, she could immediately evade both economic and metaphysical risk of a liberty in which ends and aims had to be contrived without assistance.” Later, worldwide researchers designed gender-training materials based on the view of Beauvoir. As a result, in the very first chapter of any gender-training document, there was an emphasis on "Sex and Gender”.


The construct “gender” was fine as it was translated into English; on the contrary though, it did not sound as clear as in French. With regard to French grammar, “Genre” is used to distinguish masculine and feminine. Therefore, it emerged from two schools of thought, one school employed the term “Genre” when referring to attributes of social relationships between male and female, while the other did not use the term "Genre"; instead they used “rapports sociaux hommes-femmes”,that also means social relationships between male and female.


As previously mentioned, the "Gender" definition above refers to social characteristics of men and women and sex refers to biological attributes that do not change regarding space and time. For example, in the past, our famous heroines Ba Trung and Ba Trieu preformed their natural roles of women such as pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding, and in the recent past Hillary Clinton also performed the same function. How interesting that due to these biological characteristics a woman would take on such a very crucial and weighty responsibility as carrying a child in her womb for nine months. In the past, women had to deliver many children; a family could have had from 10 to 20 children, which took women many years in fulfilling their natural roles of motherhood. Thus, they engaged in limited productive work and, quite the opposite, men occupied and took on social roles and constructed, and maintained a patriarchal society. As a result, women lost their important positions of productivity, withdrew to the home to take care of their children, and did the housework. Incidentally and apparently the natural role of women was equated with their traditional social status, personal identities, and life opportunities in such social conditions and circumstances.


Unlike traditional society, in this modern era policy on family planning has come into effect so that each family can plan their pregnancies and have only one or two children; hence, women have more time to pursue their career choices and work outside the home.  Researchers emphasize that how social characteristics are established depends on family education, culture, changes in history, politics, and social conditions. The social attributes can be changed constantly. If they were not changeable, as biological features are not, gender studies would never exist or develop.


Society needs to change its social structures and gendered social order to ensure equal rights. During the second wave of feminism, women fought for the right to own their body and moved their focus from women studies to gender studies. This means that to achieve gender equality, it required the support, participation, and cooperation of men. In reality, studying gender, women’s issues, and the relationship between women and men, is still limited. There is still a lot of room and themes and topics for inter-disciplinary researchers to explore and conduct their research. 


The third wave of feminism (1990 – present) 


At the beginning of the third wave of feminism, feminists focused on occupations and professions that were thought to belong to males. That included science, politics, economics, culture, and technology, disciplines that had historically belonged to males. There were also other issues to be fought in the women’s movement, such as HIV/AIDS, sexual violence and prostitution. 


The Third-wave of feminism beginning in 1990 was a movement of younger feminists who grew up with feminism. As inheritors of women’s studies curricula in school and a much less gender-segregated social, economic, and political world, they rejected the idea that women were oppressed by men. Rather, they included men as feminist activists. They assumed that gender equality was the norm and the union of women and female sexuality were forms of power. They tended to exercise their belief in politics outside of the mainstream organizations and media, through confrontational e-zines (email marketing [*])and street protests, and they connected with each other through social media rather than formal organizations [4].


Feminist movements have occurred in many countries around the world and the organizations have developed comprehensively and with insight in different disciplines. There are many feminist theories including: Liberal, Marxist, Socialist, Radical, Social Construction, Postmodern Feminism, and Queer Theory (a very specific subset of gay & lesbian studies). All these theory categories analyze gender inequality problems and determine how people became advantaged or disadvantaged in a society dominated by men. The Liberal feminism movement demands equal rights and opportunities between men and women in all aspects of life, especially the requirement of equal access to education and politics as men. Liberal feminists oppose the idea that women exist only to be the helpers of men, who are responsible for their natural role of becoming pregnant, delivering a child, and breastfeeding. They are opposed to the idea that women’s IQ or intellectuality is less than that of men. Liberal feminists believe that women have the same intellectual capacity as men and according to them women are dominated and bound by men’s norms and legal rules. Their belief is proven by the laws of many countries such as:  the laws of Islamic Sharia, the laws of the Malaysian Islamic Hudur, the Shinto laws in Japan, the Vietnamese Hong Duc Codes, the laws of the 15th century, and the Vietnam Gia Long laws of the 17th century [2], [4].


A Discussion of Practical Gender Issues


Questions and answers

The waves of feminism emerged in the late 19th century when science and technology developed. Does the process of industrialization create inequality for women?


Dr. Du responded that it is not exactly the case. She argued that in modern society perhaps, the form of inequality is revealed more explicitly because individuals have more rights and because of the changes of social conditions. During feudal times, societies were dominated by men and divided into classes that stretched from the very top of society to the very bottom. Women were at the lowest rung of the social ladder. They had few rights and little property. The disadvantaged men remained conservative and patriarchal. As Uncle Ho said, "Poor women during the colonial period suffered two to three layers of oppression."  Women in the higher classes relied on men. In the past, ideas of equality and equal rights had not developed yet. Through space and time and various revolutions, the ideas regarding independence and gender equality were slowly formed and continuously developed.  When people are aware of inequality, they will stand up and fight for justice. It totally differs from the misty times when human history began.


One participant asked Dr. Du’s opinion of the label “social attributes”. 


She responded that regarding behaviorism, it is said that a woman has to be reserved and shy; women are taught that way. Therefore, I think gender inequality is indicated not only in something big but in something small as well.


We live in a social environment that influences our behaviors. However, each individual can choose the most appropriate attributes and can show the world who one is. Think of them as a  MOSAIC; it is an image with thousands of small pieces, with diverse colors and different materials, so women today have more choices and many roles that make them happier. Unlike traditional women, those women in the current era not only grew up getting married, having children, caring for family, but they also have more opportunities to advance their status outside the home, to pursue higher education, political power, and contribute to society. Depending on social changes, economic structures, social organization, culture and politics, women can make the best decisions for themselves and for the benefit of society. With regard to the evolution of society, if we are aware of social changes and social conditions, we may choose progressive behaviors. Dr. Du has an expertise in this environment, thus she sometimes compares the bio- diversity of habitat with the certain evolution of the human environment.  If one society has a diverse race, religion, ethnicities and culture, one can choose the best fit to promote social advancement. In addition, the impact of policy, law, political wills and ideology also plays a significant role in the development of society.


One male participant commented that: “if society "labels" women then women can also ‘do away with the label’ as well. Our society requires women to do their best outside the home as well as in the family. This is bias. This is label. This is too much of an inequality for women. In our present context, women have to work too hard and are too burdened to fulfill “dual roles”. Due to social changes, I think that people need to change overall as well.”


Another participant made a statement: “Concerning women in leadership, men acknowledge that there is a problem with women and women relationships. Women don’t want to vote for women and though male leaders may assign women to higher positions, few women are voted for by other women. It seems that this is a weakness of women and they need to change first, instead of asking that men treat them equally”.


Dr. Du responded with the argument that men do not vote for women and neither do women because of many factors: 1) many people think women lack ability and talent, 2) women should not participate in leadership roles because this area is the highest and most powerful hierarchy that has always been dominated by males, 3) people mistrust women in leadership, 4) people have pity for women because they are too busy with housework, caring for their family, and are reproductively active; when women engage in leadership, their working hours are very long and cannot be scheduled in advance, and 5) women are often jealous of each other. Other assumptions are that women do not help each other in progressing; therefore, if there is any woman who is outstanding other women may drag her down.


Envy also occurs in male groups. Men many times will conspire to confound other men to get a promotion or plot to overthrow the government. Why don’t people talk about men’s envy rather than that of women? Is it a form of discrimination toward women? Dr. Du stressed that whatever the reasons are, if men and women are conscious of stereotypes, we can still repair or change them through education or becoming more aware. Many parts of the world have changed, why is it that we cannot?


In addition to the above analysis, regarding the roots of these views, Simone de Beauvoir explained that "women, especially traditional women, are preconditioned to them." This means that women from generation to generation have always been confined to their homes, to the kitchen, and to care-giving roles. They often do trivial things around the home; as a result their visions are practical and short. If people see any women as prominent and talented leaders, they find it too significant, too outstanding, and too new to traditional patriarchy. More importantly, these women challenge views and values that have existed for centuries and they dare to go beyond the set roles, norms and rules and definition of women in society; these are features of gender. If women recognize that these disadvantages can be affected by education, ideology, culture, economic structure and political will, they can raise their awareness through education and find proper ways to overcome and change perceptions, behaviors and attitudes, and gradually achieve common progress for both men and women.


Two more questions asked were: how do men view gender inequality? What are the roles of men regarding the issue?


A young male researcher responded by pointing out that we teach our children gender attributes at home and at schools; for example, boys play with guns, knives, and swords where in contrast girls play with dolls, and act out cooking roles and care-giving roles. Recently, mass media broadcasted a new phenomenon of single women with a higher education or women intellectuals with broken families. They were criticized for their own choice of how they were living. The male researcher thought that any society wants to have gender equality; however, Vietnam also needs to call for gender equality for men. Why? Because men have to pay for their girlfriends during courtship and women have more benefits when they have a medical check-up to determine their health; this is an inequality toward men.


A young female participant expressed her view that laws on gender equality were introduced; that is, both men and women are equal with regard to legislation, however, the inequality still exists pervasively due to ideology that is taught. To improve ideology takes a very long time. In a patriarchal society, people highly value males; consequently selection by sex is very common. In addition, when considering education, poor families tend to invest in their sons. They do not choose girls because they think sons are more important than daughters; sons are potential breadwinners while girls continue to be subordinate and dependent. Girls need only to learn cooking, sewing and finding a good husband; that is good enough. With such a pervasive mentality, to advance gender equality is a long journey and requires holistic solutions to eliminate the ingrained and dinosaur views, as well as active involvement of the entire society. As a matter of fact, the status of men is higher. There is obviously favoritism towards men, even in language. Through language, we understand other people’s perspectives of women and whether or not there is a bias toward them.


Dr. Du agreed with the young female respondent’s opinion on gender from a language aspect. Some Vietnamese researchers have had a discourse on gender. In English, the word “chairman” was used in the past, but now people use “chairperson” and “policeman” has been replaced by “police officer”, and “Mrs. or Miss by Ms”.


Another young male attendee disagreed with the above argument. He debated that women in society want to get married to smart and intelligent men, therefore men are also discriminated against. Another issue he brought up was that the male and female populations in our society are equal in number, thus why does discrimination and gender inequality exist? He explained that these problems are due to economics. People who have power and are better off economically, financially, and politically, have the resources to control the lower class, the disadvantaged, the vulnerable, the weak, and the poor. The reasons why men dominate society are simply because men were hunters for centuries and even now bring food to family tables every day. This indicates that men have more power, and as a result they rule the world and create their own regimes. The idea that women are bound within the home, care for family members, do not work outside is natural and universal. There is no gender opposing viewpoint here. Taking for example that men have adulterous relationships with someone, yet they never abandon their families; this is contrary to women. In addition, he stressed that the old values or qualities are gone only when there are new ones to replace them. If we say that the four qualities required of women are hard-working, being beautiful, being well-spoken, and being well-behaved are out of date then what are the new qualities?


Another opinion expressed was that the seminar was very interesting and meaningful and that gender issues attract an audience’s curiosity, interests and concerns. In terms of the gender equality law, there is a disparity in women’s retirement age. Currently men retire at age 60 and women at 55 – five years before men. This is another inequality and another facet of gender discrimination for women in Vietnam. Dr. Yu added that early retirement constrains women’s professional jobs and promotion opportunities for 5 years and also leads to a lower monthly pension compared with that of men. Meanwhile women also have reproductive roles and if they have two children, it may take them at least 4 to 5 years to care for their children. In addition to preventing women from rising to a senior management level, considered from this angle, women are promoted more slowly than men and have fewer opportunities for on-the-job training and career advancement. Professor Le Thi Quy, Director of the Center for Gender and Women’s Studies, says: “that women lack the opportunity to be promoted to higher levels after they turn 50, while men have the privilege until they turn 55, which makes it difficult for women to climb the corporate ladder” [2], [5]. Therefore, the pension age needs to be equal to that of men and women should have an equal opportunity to contribute to society as do men. In overall terms, the government on the one hand has called for an increase in participation by women intellectuals in governmental organizations, while on the other hand only few women achieve this goal. There are many causes for this problem including early age retirement. For example, a female rector of a university must retire at the age of 55 while a male rector is able to participate for another five-year term.


Also, there are concerns with raising women’s retirement age to 60 from the current 55 which are associated with the working capacity of female laborers after 55. This discussion impacts all sectors of the economy and social services and leads to certain revisions in the labor laws to provide women the right to retire at the same age as men. Hoa, a Senior Development Specialist in the World Bank East Asia Pacific region, has claimed that though the opposite party addresses the fact that women often suffer from more health issues compared to men and, therefore, women merit to retire early as they would not have energy to work, he indicated that in reality “many women pensioners continue to participate actively in the labor market after retirement: about 61 percent of retirees aged 51-55 and 55 percent aged 55-59 work mostly in the informal sector” (Hoa Thi Mong Pham, 2008, p.8) [5].  As a result, early age retirement limits women’s jobs and promotion opportunities compared to men, particularly for those who have wonderful leadership abilities and for those who want to be leaders.


Some arguments have stressed that society severely criticizes women with regard to adultery.  People think that when involved in adultery, women leave their family for good, while men do not, they stay to take care of family; this is gender bias. Concerning the four traditional values “hard-working, being beautiful, being well-spoken, and being well-behaved", women traditionally must also know sewing, knitting and cooking, however, today with the support of science and technology women are still well able to take on family responsibilities without knowing these skills.


In a further opinion, a participant raised the concern that if people have a mindset that women who are highly educated cause a high rate of divorce and singlehood, then the question is when or how equality can be achieved and how it is that women dare to study to become more highly educated. Actually, there is no research or sociological evidence indicating these phenomena. What a dogmatic view! On the contrary, intellectual women at research institutes are happy with their marriage, they maintain family happiness, and benefit society in many ways. The participant cited the old saying “To live with a sensible person who is, however, not strongly minded is far better than to live with someone for a hundred years but who is ignorant”. Men are very smart, they want to become married to wise women with whom they can exchange and share ideas. Women who are highly educated have the ability to quickly gather and understand information and be sensitive and accurate; men love wives who comprehend what they are saying. Often times, smart women are able to sense the meaning of an entire situation within a few sentences. Men are also proud of well-educated females. Therefore, women with higher education will bring tremendous benefits and subtle things to the family, community, and social development. These women encourage young women to continue to pursue a higher education. Women should not give up opportunities for learning and potential empowerment because of a few individual biases or dogmatic opinions.


Dr. Du was in agreement with the above perspective on encouraging women to enhance the path of knowledge and education; she also stated that the Government and the State encourage and provide conditions for women to pursue their higher education. All that remains then is their determination; the more women learn, the more they enjoy it and the more purpose they find in their lives. In the past, women followed a set of ideas that dictated they have a stable family with children and a good husband; however, in the context of today's society the goal of women is higher and wider, along with the family. Women have more choices and brighter outlooks such as business, education, and contribution to society. Dr. Du stressed in a metaphorical way, “Don’t put all your ‘eggs’ in one basket. Do put your eggs into several so that if one basket breaks, there are still others”. With regard to divorce, developed countries have a very high rate of divorce and this is not because women have obtained a higher education. There is no correlation between the two issues. Regarding adultery, no society supports it. We should take a biological approach to interpret the problem of adultery. Each society has its institutions and laws on marriage. Marriage has to be based on true love and willingness by both sides, and legal and social acceptance. When it comes to inequality or discrimination against women, it is a detriment to family and society. To some extent Dr. Du also agreed with an attendant’s opinion on the distinction between the biological and psychological aspects of men and women.


There was a final comment during the discussion session on the debate that society in general places very high demands on women. It is not easy for women to fulfill dual roles in an excellent manner. In a humorous voice, one participant said, “I hope that men will gradually reduce gender bias, they should not treat their wives as if they were ‘cold bread’; they should see them as delicious, organic, whole grain bread, or seafood fried rice, or hot chicken soup. To promote gender equality, women always need the support and cooperation of men."


Concluding Remarks


Dr. Thai Thi Ngoc Du concluded that what was shared and discussed this day related to gender stereotypes. They include that: women should be homebound to care for their husband’s family and children, they should not work outside the home; when it comes to adultery, women are fiercely criticized and condemned compared to men; women who prefer to be single or get divorced should not study to obtain a higher education and gain leadership status in society, and women do not support or vote for women. These are gender biases and if we dig deeper into our sub-consciousness, discrimination against women is revealed; the discrimination is hardly seen on the surface. According to Dr. Du’s experience in France, nine out of ten of her friends’ husbands took care of the cooking while she was visiting them. The husbands felt joy in being free to do the cooking and housework. Or, Vietnamese men who lived during a difficult time in the economy, voluntarily went to buy groceries, cooked, took care of the housework as well as worked in society without an ingrained mentality that housework is the responsibility of women. These are work responsibilities for ‘both sides’ that are free from stereotyping because of each other’s love and respect.


Last but certainly not least, Dr. Du expressed a high spirit of optimism regarding the process of enhancement of gender equality in Vietnam. Today the younger generations have more choices, more opportunities, more freedom, and are more open to promoting gender equality, although in comparison to other nations we still have a lot of things to accomplish. She also thanked all of the participants who shared their thoughts openly and honestly. Finally, she said that it is important that everything we do in society is geared toward eliminating poverty, disadvantages experienced by women and men in the lower classes in society and toward gaining freedom for all people in society regardless of whether they are rich, poor or somewhere in between.


References:

Law on Gender Equality (2006). Retrieved July 15, 2012, from http://thuvienphapluat.vn/archive/Luat/Luat-Binh-dang-gioi-2006-73-2006-...

Lê Thị Quý (2009). Retrieved July 10, 2012, from http://gas.hoasen.edu.vn/vi/gas-page/van-de-cong-bang-va-binh-dang-gioi-doi-voi-nu-tri-thuc

Beauvoir. De. Simone (1996). The Second Sex. Women Publisher, Hanoi, Vietnam

Judith Lorber (2012). Gender Inequality: feminist theories and policies. 5th ed, Oxford University Press

Hoa Thi Mong Pham (2008). The facts on women’s retirement age in Vietnam. World Bank website

http://gas.hoasen.edu.vn/en/gas-page/seminar-gender-perception-young-research-staff